RE: #Depend Maximum Absorbency Underwear for Men, Large/Extra Large, 17 Count (Pack of 4) sicangueyapaha: RE: #Depend Maximum Absorbency Underwear for Men, Large/Extra Large, 17 Count (Pack of 4)

Monday, August 12, 2013

RE: #Depend Maximum Absorbency Underwear for Men, Large/Extra Large, 17 Count (Pack of 4)

#Depend Maximum Absorbency Underwear for Men, Large/Extra Large, 17 Count (Pack of 4)

  • An underwear-like waistband provides a snug fit and looks like regular underwear. A blue bar inside the waistband indicates the back of the underwear
  • Protects right where men need it most, with an absorb-loc core
  • Worry free odor control
  • Brief-like leg openings help protect against leakage and provide snug comfort like men's underwear

#1Depend Maximum Absorbency Underwear for Men, Large/Extra Large, 17 Count (Pack of 4)
#1Depend Maximum Absorbency Underwear for Men, Large/Extra Large, 17 Count (Pack of 4)

lontong : Depend
Available from :2



Now in soft peach, Depend for Women Underwear is specially made to fit the shape of a woman. It comfortable oval-cut leg openings and protection where you need it most. Soft, quiet, and breathable, they're easy to use -- just pull them on and off.

Style and Protection Just for You

Superior protection in a classic women's style brief.


Depend for Women Underwear, Maximum Absorbency, Extra-Large, 14 Count Packages, (Pack of 4) Product Shot
Why Choose Depend Brand Products?

Depend products use a thin, absorbent pad made of super-absorbent polymers that draws wetness in, away from the skin, helping to lock in urine and odors while helping to keep skin dry. All Depend products are latex-free and contain no lotions or fragrances.

Women's Underwear Men's Underwear
Underwear Comparison Chart

Moderate
& Max
Protection
Underwear Comparison Chart

Moderate
Protection
(Colors)
Underwear Comparison Chart

Maximum
Protection
Underwear Comparison Chart

Maximum
Protection
(Colors)What's in the Box

Depend for Women Underwear, Large, Maximum Absorbency, 16 Count Packages (Pack of 4).


     


No comments:

Post a Comment